Conceptualizing the archive and “archive stories”

Gosh’s experiences portray archives as “contact zones” wherein interactions with others reveals nationalist perceptions about the archive materials and new interpretations. Are the “archive stories” that emerge from these networks relevant to colonial histories or are they more useful in another form: epilogue, journal article, edited volume?  It seems to me that archive stories are most useful for a colonial history when they reflect on the methodological limits the archive creates, rather than nationalist glosses on the interpretation.  In other words, since the archive itself–as Milligan, Fritzsche, and Robertson all point out–is a deeply connected to national goals, what can archive stories tell us about history before the nation-state existed?

When are archive stories debilitating to our work?  In other words, do we have examples of historical works wherein the archive stories or ethnographic anecdotes are distracting to the work as a whole?


One Comment on “Conceptualizing the archive and “archive stories””

  1. Dr. Liz says:

    I don’t understand your question. Can you elaborate further?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s